What was the purpose of the Beyond Vietnam speech?

What is the main idea of Beyond Vietnam?

Delivered in New York at the height of the Vietnam War in 1967, “Beyond Vietnam” is Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s powerful call to America to end the Vietnam War, as well as to change the values that lead to all such morally dubious wars.

What is the purpose of Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence?

One of Martin Luther King Jr.’s lesser known yet equally impactful speeches, “Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence,” condemns the violence and atrocities committed by the U.S against the Vietnamese in their foolish bid to stop the spread of communism in Southeast Asia.

What did MLK say about the Vietnam War?

Later that year King framed the issue of war in Vietnam as a moral issue: “As a minister of the gospel,” he said, “I consider war an evil. I must cry out when I see war escalated at any point” (“Opposes Vietnam War”).

What is the tone of Beyond Vietnam?

King’s criticism of the war as “broken and eviscerated,” allows him to establish a disappointed tone that conveys the idea that the war is immoral and by doing so his precise word choice lets him to attack it as such.

IT\'S FUNNING:  Is English language spoken in Thailand?

How does Chavez use of the word radical impact the tone of his speech?

Cesar Chavez uses the word radical at the beginning of his speech on the first page. The word radical means major or drastic. This makes the tone of the speech more serious and makes it seem more important.

How does King’s introduction of counterclaims help move his argument forward?

Counter argument: An argument or reason that is put forward to oppose any idea in another argument. Martin Luther King Jr. uses counter arguments in his letter to prove that the arguments made by the clergyman were false, and thus help MLK persuade his audience to believe him and support the movement.

What two things did Dr King dislike about the Vietnam War?

King became active in taking a stand against the war in Vietnam. He complained that all the money spent on weapons could have been used to make the lives of the poor better. He also hated the violence of it. Many people thought his comments took attention away from civil rights.